Skip to main content

restricted groups - adding to members

for a long time, it's been thought that restricted groups in a group policy would only perform a wipe and replace of members of a local group. let's dispel this myth. what seems to be fairly unknown is that restricted groups is capable of adding members to a group without removing the existing members. for instance, let's assume we have a group called MyGroupA that needs to be in the administrators group of a set of workstations. there are two methods we can do this. the first, you're probably familiar with, which is to replace anything in the administrators group with a new set of groups or users. where is this useful? if you want to make sure that any accounts that are mysteriously added to the local admins group are removed and replaced with your set of users/groups, use this method. i won't elaborate on this since this is fairly common and understood. the other method is adding users/groups to local admins without removing the users/groups that exist. back to MyGroupA. here's how to set it up.
  1. open up the group policy you want to effect
  2. under computer configuration, navigate to windows settings\security settings
  3. locate the restricted groups folder. right-click on the folder and choose add group...
  4. add in the group - domain\MyGroupA, for instance
  5. in the configure membership for dialog, there are two panes. in the bottom pane labeled this group is a member of, click add
  6. type in administrators. click ok
  7. click ok to close the dialog
that's it. now refresh the policy on a workstation. it should have added the group specified into the administrators group.

Comments

  1. dude. i didn't know that. i am at your feet. - matthew

    ReplyDelete
  2. Check this out for some issues we have seen

    http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=810076

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

using preloadpkgonsite.exe to stage compressed copies to child site distribution points

UPDATE: john marcum sent me a kind email to let me know about a problem he ran into with preloadpkgonsite.exe in the new SCCM Toolkit V2 where under certain conditions, packages will not uncompress.  if you are using the v2 toolkit, PLEASE read this blog post before proceeding.   here’s a scenario that came up on the mssms@lists.myitforum.com mailing list. when confronted with a situation of large packages and wan links, it’s generally best to get the data to the other location without going over the wire. in this case, 75gb. :/ the “how” you get the files there is really not the most important thing to worry about. once they’re there and moved to the appropriate location, preloadpkgonsite.exe is required to install the compressed source files. once done, a status message goes back to the parent server which should stop the upstream server from copying the package source files over the wan to the child site. anyway, if it’s a relatively small amount of packages, you can

How to Identify Applications Using Your Domain Controller

Problem Everyone has been through it. We've all had to retire or replace a domain controller at some point in our checkered collective experiences. While AD provides very intelligent high availability, some applications are just plain dumb. They do not observe site awareness or participate in locating a domain controller. All they want is the name or IP of one domain controller which gets hardcoded in a configuration file somewhere, deeply embedded in some file folder or setting that you are never going to find. How do you look at a DC and decide which applications might be doing it? Packet trace? Logs? Shut it down and wait for screaming? It seems very tedious and nearly impossible. Potential Solution Obviously I wouldn't even bother posting this if I hadn't run across something interesting. :) I ran across something in draftcalled Domain Controller Isolation. Since it's in draft, I don't know that it's published yet. HOWEVER, the concept is based off

sccm: content hash fails to match

back in 2008, I wrote up a little thing about how distribution manager fails to send a package to a distribution point . even though a lot of what I wrote that for was the failure of packages to get delivered to child sites, the result was pretty much the same. when the client tries to run the advertisement with an old package, the result was a failure because of content mismatch. I went through an ordeal recently capturing these exact kinds of failures and corrected quite a number of problems with these packages. the resulting blog post is my effort to capture how these problems were resolved. if nothing else, it's a basic checklist of things you can use.   DETECTION status messages take a look at your status messages. this has to be the easiest way to determine where these problems exist. unfortunately, it requires that a client is already experiencing problems. there are client logs you can examine as well such as cas, but I wasn't even sure I was going to have enough m