Skip to main content

sms: reporting is single-threaded

a fellow mvp, brian rogers, started drilling me about sms reporting the other day (probably because all the smart people are hanging out in san diego drinking margaritas and eating fish tacos in Old Town pretending like they're at a conference). the questions started around how to best setup sms reporting for load. hashing back and forth the basics, it was assumed that sms reporting probably taxed sql server the most ... since the only bottleneck was page faults. brian alluded to a possible problem where the sms reporting function executes one request at a time. we started looking into this and discovered this to be the case. reviewing logs, he discovered that this was indeed the case. i did the same test myself and found that to be happening. the reporting point is, in fact, single-threaded. even though the database can handle multiple queries, the reporting point only sends one at a time. if the browser is closed after a query is sent, the query request does not end. in fact, it'll keep running on the server until it has completed or timed out. this means anyone running a massive report can stall anyone else's request. i can only speculate that the single-threaded operation is to ensure that reporting doesn't overwhelm the sms server/database from fulfilling other functions. the problem here is, what if you have a design where reporting is handled from a database with no clients? that implies that regardless of it functioning solely for the purpose of reporting, it is still single-threaded. it seems the only solution is to add additional reporting points that users can connect to and request reports with.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

using preloadpkgonsite.exe to stage compressed copies to child site distribution points

UPDATE: john marcum sent me a kind email to let me know about a problem he ran into with preloadpkgonsite.exe in the new SCCM Toolkit V2 where under certain conditions, packages will not uncompress.  if you are using the v2 toolkit, PLEASE read this blog post before proceeding.   here’s a scenario that came up on the mssms@lists.myitforum.com mailing list. when confronted with a situation of large packages and wan links, it’s generally best to get the data to the other location without going over the wire. in this case, 75gb. :/ the “how” you get the files there is really not the most important thing to worry about. once they’re there and moved to the appropriate location, preloadpkgonsite.exe is required to install the compressed source files. once done, a status message goes back to the parent server which should stop the upstream server from copying the package source files over the wan to the child site. anyway, if it’s a relatively small amount of packages, you can

How to Identify Applications Using Your Domain Controller

Problem Everyone has been through it. We've all had to retire or replace a domain controller at some point in our checkered collective experiences. While AD provides very intelligent high availability, some applications are just plain dumb. They do not observe site awareness or participate in locating a domain controller. All they want is the name or IP of one domain controller which gets hardcoded in a configuration file somewhere, deeply embedded in some file folder or setting that you are never going to find. How do you look at a DC and decide which applications might be doing it? Packet trace? Logs? Shut it down and wait for screaming? It seems very tedious and nearly impossible. Potential Solution Obviously I wouldn't even bother posting this if I hadn't run across something interesting. :) I ran across something in draftcalled Domain Controller Isolation. Since it's in draft, I don't know that it's published yet. HOWEVER, the concept is based off

sccm: content hash fails to match

back in 2008, I wrote up a little thing about how distribution manager fails to send a package to a distribution point . even though a lot of what I wrote that for was the failure of packages to get delivered to child sites, the result was pretty much the same. when the client tries to run the advertisement with an old package, the result was a failure because of content mismatch. I went through an ordeal recently capturing these exact kinds of failures and corrected quite a number of problems with these packages. the resulting blog post is my effort to capture how these problems were resolved. if nothing else, it's a basic checklist of things you can use.   DETECTION status messages take a look at your status messages. this has to be the easiest way to determine where these problems exist. unfortunately, it requires that a client is already experiencing problems. there are client logs you can examine as well such as cas, but I wasn't even sure I was going to have enough m