Skip to main content

powershell: converting int64 datetime to something legible

i find that i’m constantly converting AD datetime fields from something that looks like 130552642641560221 to something that looks like 9/15/2014 10:17:44 AM. i don’t know which you prefer, but to me, the second output is the one that most people won’t complain about when i give it to them.

over on stackoverflow.com i found this post that wraps it up pretty nicely. so, let’s say you want to look at the lastlogontimestamp attribute of a user named marcus. here’s a typical command that would show you the output:

get-aduser marcus -properties lastlogontimestamp | select lastlogontimestamp

bam. you get the int64 value. personally, i get lost counting nanoseconds* after i exhaust what i can count on both hands. if you’re like me, you can convert this handily to a readable datetime format like this:

get-aduser marcus -properties lastlogontimestamp | select @{ n='llts'; e={[datetime]::fromfiletime($_.lastlogontimestamp)} }

we’re just creating an expression in the hash table to format lastlogontimestamp to the way we want to read it -- like humans. now, the quest powershell modules will do this automatically. of course, no one uses those anymore, right? :)

 

* and if you were curious, this is the definition of the int64 format -- contains a 64-bit value representing the number of 100-nanosecond intervals since january 1, 1601 (utc).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

using preloadpkgonsite.exe to stage compressed copies to child site distribution points

UPDATE: john marcum sent me a kind email to let me know about a problem he ran into with preloadpkgonsite.exe in the new SCCM Toolkit V2 where under certain conditions, packages will not uncompress.  if you are using the v2 toolkit, PLEASE read this blog post before proceeding.   here’s a scenario that came up on the mssms@lists.myitforum.com mailing list. when confronted with a situation of large packages and wan links, it’s generally best to get the data to the other location without going over the wire. in this case, 75gb. :/ the “how” you get the files there is really not the most important thing to worry about. once they’re there and moved to the appropriate location, preloadpkgonsite.exe is required to install the compressed source files. once done, a status message goes back to the parent server which should stop the upstream server from copying the package source files over the wan to the child site. anyway, if it’s a relatively small amount of packages, you can

How to Identify Applications Using Your Domain Controller

Problem Everyone has been through it. We've all had to retire or replace a domain controller at some point in our checkered collective experiences. While AD provides very intelligent high availability, some applications are just plain dumb. They do not observe site awareness or participate in locating a domain controller. All they want is the name or IP of one domain controller which gets hardcoded in a configuration file somewhere, deeply embedded in some file folder or setting that you are never going to find. How do you look at a DC and decide which applications might be doing it? Packet trace? Logs? Shut it down and wait for screaming? It seems very tedious and nearly impossible. Potential Solution Obviously I wouldn't even bother posting this if I hadn't run across something interesting. :) I ran across something in draftcalled Domain Controller Isolation. Since it's in draft, I don't know that it's published yet. HOWEVER, the concept is based off

sccm: content hash fails to match

back in 2008, I wrote up a little thing about how distribution manager fails to send a package to a distribution point . even though a lot of what I wrote that for was the failure of packages to get delivered to child sites, the result was pretty much the same. when the client tries to run the advertisement with an old package, the result was a failure because of content mismatch. I went through an ordeal recently capturing these exact kinds of failures and corrected quite a number of problems with these packages. the resulting blog post is my effort to capture how these problems were resolved. if nothing else, it's a basic checklist of things you can use.   DETECTION status messages take a look at your status messages. this has to be the easiest way to determine where these problems exist. unfortunately, it requires that a client is already experiencing problems. there are client logs you can examine as well such as cas, but I wasn't even sure I was going to have enough m